Note to Readers

Please Note: The editor of White Refugee blog is a member of the Ecology of Peace culture.

Summary of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Problem Solving: Poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc; are some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources.

Ecology of Peace RH factual reality: 1. Earth is not flat; 2. Resources are finite; 3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in resource conflict; 4. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, and/or nations want to reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; they should cooperate & sign their responsible freedom oaths; to implement Ecology of Peace Scientific and Cultural Law as international law; to require all citizens of all races, religions and nations to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits.

EoP v WiP NWO negotiations are updated at EoP MILED Clerk.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

The Road to Sharpeville; and the ANC's Orwellian Memoryhole..

Events leading up to the attack on Sharpeville Police Station in March, 1960

Saturday, April 18, 2009 at 5:09am
Afrikaner Broadcasting Corporation

The literary work by P.C. Swanepoel titled Really Inside BOSS, was used as a source of reference for the following article. During the terrorist attack on the Sharpeville Police Station, Mr. Swanepoel was an employee of the Bureau of State Security (BOSS) and describes in detail the causes which led up to the events at Sharpeville on 21 March, 1960.

The South African Government and Police were vilified following the Sharpeville attack. The most common criticism accused a lack of compromise and negotiation by the State when dealing with the terrorist element in question. The police were facing extremist terrorist leaders determined to undermine the State and the terrorists did not hesitate to sacrifice innocent lives in pursuit of their aims. The police were not trained as negotiators. Ordinary policemen were fulfilling their designated duty to uphold law & order helping to maintain the peace. The situation which transpired at Sharpeville spiralled out of control, the police reacted accordingly defending life and property.
The ANC embarked on a ‘potato boycott’ in May, 1959, after sensational reports in a journal aimed at black readers alleged a potato farmer in the Bethal district had mistreated his workers. A ‘stay-at-home’ was organised as a reinforcement of the boycott. Simultaneously a crowd of several thousand rioters had gathered at the Cator-Manor slum on the outskirts of Durban. The rioters initially attacked the municipal beer hall.

The police were called to the scene and rumours spread of the police being vastly outnumbered. Strong suspicion was present of ANC cadres instigating the beer hall attack. The police would baton charge the attackers, who would retreat and subsequently regroup a short distance away, repeating the attack on the beer hall. The police would withdraw, whereupon the mob would attack the police with stones. The situation was seemingly close to resolution.

In a sudden turn of events a school bus filled with small black children drove slowly past the rioters. The black mob assaulted the driver of the school bus, smashing the bus windows with the petrified children inside; they set the bus on fire. Two of the rioters stationed themselves at the door of the bus preventing any children from leaving. The children were forced to escape through jagged glass windows, falling to the ground bloodied and bruised, whereupon the mob would beat the small children with sticks. Mr. P.C. Swanepoel was an eyewitness to these events.
The Government had implemented the liquor act, forbidding blacks from buying European liquor. The regulation was not distinctly South African. The precursor to the United Nations, The League of Nations mandating the territory of South West Africa to South Africa, specifically forbade South Africa from allowing access to European liquor by the indigenous black population. Reluctantly the police were obligated to enforce this act, increasingly turning the natives against them. The raids in Cato Manor were conducted by black and white policemen and were greatly resented by the black inhabitants. All liquor discovered was destroyed on site. A few weeks before Sharpeville, one of the raids went badly wrong. A raiding party of black and white policemen were surrounded and attacked by a crowd of several hundred blacks. The white policemen were armed with revolvers, the black police carried batons. Despite screams from their black police comrades soliciting them to use their revolvers, the white policemen attempted to reason with the mob, resulting in the entire group being murdered.

Previous to this incident, in the 1950’s a similar situation transpired. Sergeant Shorty de Lange, a fluent Zulu speaker, led a party of policemen to a dagga (cannabis) plantation in Natal. The party was surrounded by approximately a hundred Zulus. The black policemen pleaded with him to command the opening of fire, refusing and opting to negotiate instead. Resulting in all the white policemen and most of the black policemen being killed.

Against this background occurred the events at Sharpeville. The global outrage was the fact that white policemen had fired upon black rioters. Quoting the CIA financed New African (January, 1962), “Sharpeville would have had less impact had a white reporter not been there”. A few years after the Sharpeville attack, hundreds of thousands of Tutsis were slaughtered by their black countrymen in Central Africa, no one in Europe had knowledge of this genuine massacre.
At Sharpeville, the police were aware of the riotous mob surrounding them. With hundreds of sticks and traditional weapons threatening the lives of the few policemen. The defence of the Police Station was of critical importance, this had been emphasised during their police training, since it was a bastion of the State and a symbol of authority, to be defended at any cost. In defence of a Police Station the use of firearms was rightly justified.

Tom Lodge offers an account of what occurred in Sharpeville.
The Pan African Congress began their preparations at Sharpeville in March, 1960. The instigators would confront people at bus stops compelling them to burn their identity documents (Passbooks a form of Passport used by migrant labourers on work contracts in the Republic of South Africa). On the night of the 20th of March, 1960, the terrorists targeted the residences of the local bus drivers, kidnapping them. The following morning the township population was impeded from getting to their place of work. The terrorist instigators pressured the general population to head towards the police station. Two Impala Airforce Jets patrolled the skies above the crowd of over 5,000 armed people surrounding the police station, for three hours the instigators challenged the police to arrest the intimidating multitude. The police refused and called for reinforcements which arrived in Saracen armoured vehicles after midday. The perimeter fence around the police station was breached by the threatening crowd; they proceeded to attack the outnumbered police officers. For thirty seconds the police fired in self-defence, dispersing the crowd and leaving 67 fatalities and 167 injured.

The attack upon the policemen of Sharpeville was a premeditated attack against the State, the guarantors of the authority of the State, the police were left with no option being confronted with an armed and violent crowd vastly outnumbering the few policemen. The terrorist leaders & instigators achieved their initial objective; by sacrificing the lives of their supporters they could draw the hysteria of the global media.

» » » » [Afrikaner Broadcasting Corporation]

Really inside BOSS: a tale of South Africa's late intelligence service (And something about the CIA)

by P.C. "Piet" Swanepoel

Paragraphs excerpted from
Pages 10 - 14:

» » » » [Really Inside Boss] » » [ZA: White Refugee]

No comments:

FLEUR-DE-LIS HUMINT :: F(x) Population Growth x F(x) Declining Resources = F(x) Resource Wars

KaffirLilyRiddle: F(x)population x F(x)consumption = END:CIV
Human Farming: Story of Your Enslavement (13:10)
Unified Quest is the Army Chief of Staff's future study plan designed to examine issues critical to current and future force development... - as the world population grows, increased global competition for affordable finite resources, notably energy and rare earth materials, could fuel regional conflict. - water is the new oil. scarcity will confront regions at an accelerated pace in this decade.
US Army: Population vs. Resource Scarcity Study Plan
Human Farming Management: Fake Left v. Right (02:09)
ARMY STRATEGY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT: Office of Dep. Asst. of the Army Environment, Safety and Occupational Health: Richard Murphy, Asst for Sustainability, 24 October 2006
2006: US Army Strategy for Environment
CIA & Pentagon: Overpopulation & Resource Wars [01] [02]
Peak NNR: Scarcity: Humanity’s Last Chapter: A Comprehensive Analysis of Nonrenewable Natural Resource (NNR) Scarcity’s Consequences, by Chris Clugston
Peak Non-Renewable Resources = END:CIV Scarcity Future
Race 2 Save Planet :: END:CIV Resist of Die (01:42) [Full]

Fair Use Notice...

FAIR USE NOTICE: The Crime of Apartheid blog contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to provide information for research and educational purposes, and advance understanding for the Boer Volkstaat 10/31/16 Theses Petition and Briefing Paper submitted to EU & NATO. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Copyright owners who object to the fair use of their copyright news reports, may submit their objections to Crime of Apartheid Blog at: []