Concourt 23-10: RH Amicus: [0] Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of TRC Act

Excerpts from White Refugee's
First Amicus Filed in Concourt

Heads of Argument for Lara Johnstone, in Support of Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995

1. Legal Principles Addressed and Relied Upon
   
   
   
2. Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract Principles
   
   
   
3. Population Policy Common Sense Principles
   
   
   
4. TRC Fraud: 'Crime of Apartheid' Falsification of History
   
   
   
5. Radical Honesty: Culture and Religion; or Refugee Status?

Concourt 23-10 RH Amicus [I] Legal Principles Addressed and Relied Upon

Excerpts from White Refugee's
First Amicus Filed in Concourt

I. LEGAL PRINCIPLES ADDRESSED AND RELIED UPON:

• A. Multicultural Conflict-of-Laws Substantive Due Process: Clarity & Impartiality
  
  
• B. Bolam Test: Common Law Reasonableness Test: Skill & Competencies
  
  
• C. Political Necessity: Freedom of Speech & Civil Disobedience
  
  
• D. Judicial Activism: A More Searching Judicial Enquiry: Search for Truth
  
  
• E. Ecolaw 101: Laws of Sustainability: Ecological Social Contract

Concourt 23-10: RH Amicus: [III] Population Policy Common Sense Principles

Excerpts from White Refugee's
First Amicus Filed in Concourt

[III] Population Policy Common Sense Principles

• Thou Shalt Not Transgress Carrying Capacity Prophets
  
  
• Eco-Numeracy: Exponential Functions and Carrying Capacity
  
  
• Tragedy of the Commons: Limited World, Limited Rights
  
  
• Overpopulation: Resources Scarcity and Resource War Violence
  
  
• Demographics and Violence: Youth Bulges
  
  
• Population Pressures, Resource Wars, Terrorism and National Security
  
  
• How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population – Environment Connection

Radical Honesty ‘TRC was a falsification of history’ application admitted as Amicus Curiae in The Citizen vs. Robert McBride

by Andrea Muhrrteyn
Why We Are White Refugees

Delano Louw, the Snr Registrar's Clerk at the Constitutional Court, today informed Lara Johnstone that her Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court) Application had been approved by the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court; namely that “Ms. Lara Johnstone, member of the Radical Honesty culture and religion, is admitted as an Amicus Curiae.”

Her written submission must be submitted to the Constitutional Court by 25 May 2010.

The Chief Justice denied the In Forma Pauperis aspect of her Amicus Curiae Application, without providing any reasons.

Perhaps he thought that (a) she was not in fact indigent (if so he would be wrong, she is); or (b) he thought she was legally capable of representing herself, as per her Paralegal qualifications, or (c) he thought that she may be able to come up with the required financial resources for legal representation, for the Amicus Curiae application.

She did contact Foundations and Non-profits who are allegedly concerned with Population Policy issues, to invite them to participate in the Amicus application. Among others she contacted: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; Population Council and The Population Institute. She has not yet had any response from any of them.