Concourt 23-10: RH Amicus: [0] Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of TRC Act

Excerpts from White Refugee's
First Amicus Filed in Concourt

Heads of Argument for Lara Johnstone, in Support of Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Interpretation of Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, 34 of 1995

1. Legal Principles Addressed and Relied Upon
   
   
   
2. Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract Principles
   
   
   
3. Population Policy Common Sense Principles
   
   
   
4. TRC Fraud: 'Crime of Apartheid' Falsification of History
   
   
   
5. Radical Honesty: Culture and Religion; or Refugee Status?

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTEREST OF FIRST AMICUS

I. LEGAL PRINCIPLES ADDRESSED AND RELIED UPON:

A. Multicultural Conflict-of-Laws Substantive Due Process: Clarity & Impartiality
B. Bolam Test: Common Law Reasonableness Test: Skill & Competencies
C. Political Necessity: Freedom of Speech & Civil Disobedience
D. Judicial Activism: A More Searching Judicial Enquiry: Search for Truth
E. Ecolaw 101: Laws of Sustainability: Ecological Social Contract

II: TRUTH AND FORGIVENESS SOCIAL CONTRACT PRINCIPLES:

A. Radical Honesty Overview: Being Specific about Anger and Forgiveness
B. Stanley Milgram Studies on Obedience: Legal, Socio-political Implications
C. Common Law Reasonableness Test: Skills and Competencies
D. Rule of Law & Forgiveness: Individuality, Independence & Integrity

III: POPULATION POLICY COMMON SENSE PRINCIPLES:

A. Thou Shalt Not Transgress Carrying Capacity Prophets
B. Eco-Numeracy: Exponential Functions and Carrying Capacity
C. Tragedy of the Commons: Limited World, Limited Rights
D. Overpopulation: Resources Scarcity and Resource War Violence
E. Demographics and Violence: Youth Bulges
F. Population Pressures, Resource Wars and National Security
G. How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection

IV: TRC FRAUD: ‘CRIME OF APARTHEID’ FALSIFICATION OF HISTORY:

A. Negligent or Intentional Avoidance of Key Concept Definitions?
B. Amnesty Meaning Changed without Due Process?
C. Was Truth and Reconciliation Seen to be Done?
D. Did ‘Evil Apartheid’ raise Black living standards to Highest in Africa?
E. Apartheid: Crime Against Humanity; or Just War for Demographic Survival?
F. Nature & Causes of Apartheid: A Just War for Demographic Survival?
G. Farm Murders: A Rainbow TRC Peace, or Racial Hatred War Reality?

V. RADICAL HONESTY: CULTURE & RELIGION; OR REFUGEE STATUS?:

A. Radical Honesty Culture of Forgiveness Banned in SA Multi-Culture Courts
B. 40 SA Media: Endorse Legal and Political Persecution of RH White Refugee

CONCLUSION: TRC SOCIAL CONTRACT: A FRAUDULENT PR PUBLICITY STUNT

RELIEF: RECOGNIZE RADICAL HONESTY, IMPLEMENT CHOICE OF LAW RULES

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

INTEREST OF FIRST AMICUS:

1. This Amicus brief (a) addresses alternative legal arguments to those of both the Applicant and Respondent, i.e. from a Radical Honesty culture/religion perspective; (b) ‘argues points deemed too far reaching for emphasis by parties intent on winning their particular case’[2]; (c) ‘apprises the court of broad-based legal, social, economic, ecological and cultural enquiry implications for its consideration to avoid unintended consequences for groups not before the court,’[3] (d) informs the court of information to base its decision on a larger, more comprehensive, and more accurate reality based natural law legal framework, so that the court’s final judgment shall include a fully informed refined legal analysis, which provides equal protection to all SA’s tribes[4]; and (e) provides a perspective from a culture practicing sincere sensate forgiveness.

2. First Amicus, Lara Johnstone is the only member of the Radical Honesty[5] culture and religion, in South Africa. The Radical Honesty culture and religion are founded upon the Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract: Being Specific About Anger and Forgiveness6; as excerpted from: Practicing Radical Honesty[7]. Radical Honesty is a powerful process by which people can make corrections in the minds distorted and only partly conscious map of the world. Our maps of the world are distorted by our repressed anger and resentment; the greater the amount of repressed anger and resentment, the greater the distortion. The key to individuality, integrity, individual freedom, and free societies, lies in providing people with the skills and capabilities to get over their anger, and experience sincere forgiveness. It is the way the statistics from Stanley Milgram’s experiments on blind obedience to authority[8] get changed.[9]

3. Radical Honesty culture and religion was founded by Dr. Brad Blanton, who is: (1)
President and CEO of Radical Honesty Enterprises Sparrowhawk Book Publishing and The Center for Radical Honesty, both dedicated to promoting honesty in the world; (2) former candidate for Congress in 2004 and 2006, on the platform of ‘Honesty in Politics’[10]; (3) Pope of the Radical Honesty Futilitarian Church; i.e. “Dr. Truth”[11]; and (4) author of (a) Radical Honesty: How To Transform your Life by Telling the Truth; (b) Practicing Radical Honesty: How to Complete the Past, Stay in the Present and Build a Future with a Little Help from Your Friends, (c) Honest to God: A Change of Heart that Can Change the World, with Neale Donald Walsh (Conversations with God series); (d) Radical Parenting: Seven Steps to a Functional Family in a Dysfunctional World; (e) The Truthtellers: Stories of Success by Radically Honest People and (f) Beyond Good and Evil: The Eternal Split-Second-Sound-Light-Being; (g) Some New Kind of Trailer Trash. Dr. Blanton, has filed a Radical Honesty / Futilitarian Church statement in support of this Amicus.[12]

4. Rainbow Rule-of-Law Freedom of Speech Search for Truth Culture[13] Credibility: First Amicus supports the maxim of the non-violent anti-slavery publication the North Starh, whose Republican editor, Frederick Douglass was fond of saying: “I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.” As a rule-of-law political activist, she endorses the rule-of-law for all, rich, poor, white, black, left and right, religious or atheist. She filed her submission to the TRC[14] on 18 January 1999, wherein she detailed her willingness to donate her entire inheritance to facilitate sincere Truth and Forgiveness. She is separated (filed for divorce) from Demian Emile Johnson, who is, and has been, incarcerated in California Dept. of Corrections, for the entire duration of their marriage[15]. In addition to Radical Honesty she has been involved in non-violent civil disobedience actions on behalf of her former husband[16], Greenpeace[17], Amnesty Int’l, Pacific Inst. for Criminal Justice[18], Jericho 98[19], Crack the CIA[20], The Disclosure Project[21], New Abolitionist[22], Justice for Timothy McVeigh[23], Alliance for Democracy[24], Boycott 2010 World Cup[25], Right of Return for African White Refugees[26], et al[27]. She is 43 years old, has never been on welfare, has used an IUD as contraception since the age of 19, and hence has never been pregnant, nor had an abortion. She has lived an ecological small footprint life; to avoid aggravating overpopulation, resource wars; materialist consumerism and resource depletion.[28]

5. Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Social Contract Beliefs: (A) Only a sincere and serious specific, clear and unambiguous Truth and Forgiveness Social Contract[29], or similar, unequivocally understood and practiced by the common man can ever contribute to sincere and serious reconciliation and the reconstruction of any violent and conflict ridden family, community, or society; (B) any legislation or jurisprudence such as the TRC Social Contract, which professes to advocate on behalf of human rights, peace and social justice, while ignoring their ecological basis – a stable human population at slightly less than the eco-systems carrying capacity – is endorsing and practicing legal dishonesty and hypocrisy; i.e. fraud. It is legislation and jurisprudence deliberately indifferent to the laws of sustainability, advocating misery.

6. Radical Honesty in SA: A Culture and Religion, or a Refugee Status Enquiry: The results of a Multi-Culti Rainbow Little Eichmanns[30] social science experiment whereby First Amicus provided Applicants, 2nd and 3rd Amicus (incl. other political and academic SA elite) the opportunity to ‘search for the truth’ regarding the relationship between freedom of speech, sincere forgiveness, Stanley Milgrams studies on blind obedience to authority and the common law reasonableness test – i.e. their unequivocal endorsement of the rule of law; their response was “Deliberate Indifference”[31]

7. Equity will not allow a statute to be used as a cloak for fraud: Mainstream Access-to-Discourse-Gatekeeper Editors censorship[32] of nonviolent political grievances and problem solving activism facilitate a pressure cooker socio-political reality for their ‘If it Bleads, it Leads’ corporate propaganda profits, in knowledge application of:

1. ‘As long as there is some possibility of getting results by political means, the chances that any political group or individual will turn violent are truly radically small, or maybe vanishingly small’[33];
   
2. ‘The exposure in the media is what gets people’s attention. People follow what is
   happening in the news, not what is happening in the courts’[34];
   
3. ‘[Editors] abuse of media power, by means of strategies whereby they abuse public
   discourse/free speech resources; by providing certain parties with preferential and
   special access to such public discourse, and severely restricting or denying others any access to such public discourse[35];
   
4. Mainstream media avoid addressing or enquiring into root causes of problems as
   reported in How and Why Journalists Avoid Population – Environment Connection[36]; and censor non-violent root-cause problem solving activism[37].

[2] Luther T. Munford, When Does the Curiae Need an Amicus?, 1 J. App. Prac. & Process 279, 280 (1999).

[3] Paul M. Sandler & Andew D. Levy, Appellate Practice for the Maryland Lawyer: State and Federal: Amicus Briefs 331 (1994).

[4] Paul M. Smith, The Sometimes Troubled Relationship Between Courts and Their “Friends”, note 2, at 26 (1998).

[5] Founded by Dr. Brad Blanton, author, psychologist and ‘Honesty in Politics’ Congressional Candidate: www.radicalhonesty.com

[6] Chapter 9: Radical Honesty About Anger: [PDF] & [PDF]

[7] Practicing Radical Honesty, by Brad Blanton, Ph.D. [PDF]

[8] Great World Trials; The Adolph Eichmann Trial, 1961. pages 332-337; 1997.: Eichmann, speaking in his own defense, said he did not dispute the Holocaust facts. During the whole trial, Eichmann insisted that he was only "following orders"—the same Nuremberg Defense used by some of the Nazi war criminals during the 1945–1946 Nuremberg Trials. He explicitly declared that he had abdicated his conscience
in order to follow the Führerprinzip. Eichmann claimed that he was merely a "transmitter" with very little power. He testified that: "I never did anything, great or small, without obtaining in advance express instructions from Adolf Hitler or any of my superiors."

[9] Ibid. Ch. 8: Community and Compassion: Work of Stanley Milgram; (p81) [PDF]

[10] See Video Documentaries at: White Refugees

[11] See Center for Radical Honesty at: www.radicalhonesty.com

[12] Written Statement of Consent by Brad Blanton, Ph.D, to testify as expert witness to: Practicing Radical Honesty, Futilitarianism; i.e. Radical Honesty about Anger & Forgiveness; Paradigms & Contexts: Revolution of Consciousness [PDF]

[13] In Ex Parte Minister of Native Affairs in re: Yako v Beyi 1948 (1) SA 388 (A) Schreiner J.A. said lifestyle of is a choice of law factor. “Aside from an express choice of laws all connecting factors with conflict of personal laws are designed to determine, in an objective manner, the cultural orientation of the parties. Because the laws involved are conceived in terms of culture .... the connecting factors must be conceived in like terms. The most direct access to a person’s cultural leanings would clearly be his or her lifestyle.”

[14] Submission to ‘Register of Reconciliation’ and donation to Presidents Fund for Reparations to assist victims of gross violations of human rights dated 18 January 199914 [PDF]

[15] 98-05-31: Sun Times: US convict wins love and support in SA town, [PDF]; 98-09-24: YOU & Huisgenoot:
Volkrust FarmGirl Doomed Love for Black Convict, by Frans Kemp [PDF]

[16] RSA OVERSEAS: South African on hunger strike in California, by Ilda Jacobs

[17] In Easter 1993, she was arrested with a few dozen Greenpeace activists in a Save Our Seas anti-nuclear demonstration at Sellafield, Nuclear Power station, in Scotland, for trespassing. She was neither charged nor prosecuted. See: Greenpeace’s Campaign Against Ocean Dumping of Radio-Active Waste, 1978 – 1998 (www.greenpeace.org).

[18] 98-07-04 Miami Herald: Police action harms image as protectors [PDF]

[19] Jericho 98 is the movement to Free America’s Political Prisoners. She participated in Jericho 98, wrote to President Mandela to request his support for the many Anti-Apartheid Activists whom the ANC conveniently forgot, rotting away in America’s prisons: Marilyn Buck, Jaan Laaman, Tom Manning, etc. She visited Marilyn Buck in prison a few times, helped where she could.

[20] 99-03-16: San Francisco Chronicle: CIA Class Action Suit For Not Reporting Drug Trade [PDF]

[21] Presidential UFO: George W. Bush’s UFO Mail: Are You Ready for the Revolution? [PDF]

[22] New Abolitionist: Race Traitor: Zero Tolerance [PDF]

[23] April 2001: New Abolitionist: Tim McVeigh and Me [PDF]

[24] In 2000, she was arrested & detained for 3 hours, with Brad Blanton, Ronny Dugger (founding editor of Texas Observer and Alliance for Democracy), & others in the Wash, DC, Capital of the Rotunda. Issue: Campaign Finance Reform. District Attorney declined to Prosecute.

[25] 09-12-17: IOL Tech.: Anti-SA Smear Campaign on Facebook [PDF]

[26] 10-04-23: Algemene Dagblad: Zuid Afrikanen Smeken Om Wilders Hulp [PDF]; 10-04-25: Sunday Argus:
SA family seeks repatriation to Netherlands [PDF]; 10-04-30: Mail & Guardian: Persecuted Afrikaners Talk of Returning Home [PDF]; 10-05-17: Christian Science Monitor: White South Africans use Facebook in Campaign to Return to Holland [PDF]

[27] On 17 Dec 1998, she was arrested at Oakland Federal Building, with anti-war protestors, who shut down the Federal Building for two hours. She was detained by Oakland Police for an hour, before being released. Alameda Co. District Attorney declined to prosecute. 1998-12-19 Beeld: SA `plaasmeisie' vas in VSA oor Golf-protes [PDF]

[28] The ecological footprint is a measure of human demand on the Earth's ecosystems. It compares human demand with planet Earth's ecological capacity to regenerate. It represents the amount of biologically productive land and sea area needed to regenerate the resources a human population consumes and to absorb and render harmless the corresponding waste. Using this assessment, it is possible to estimate how much of the Earth (or # of Earths) it would take to support humanity if everybody lived a given lifestyle. All we do, buy and breed has ecological consequences. Ecological Footprint, excluding ‘Child-Free’ factor (www.myfootprint.org/en/) is 13.16 gha. 29 Radical Honesty Population Policy Common Sense Social Contract [PDF]

[30] Little Eichmanns: phrase used to describe the complicity of participants in destructive and immoral systems in a way that, although on an individual scale may seem indirect, when taken collectively have an Eichmann Milgram Obedience to Authority effect.

[31] HC-WC 19963-09: 140 SA Elite Deliberate Indifference to Rule of Law[PDF]

[32] “The moderate blacks were not selling the papers. We were presenting a non-violent strategy, that did not say ‘Burn, baby Burn’. A strategy that said people must come together and sit down around a negotiating table. And this is not sensational stuff; it does not sell the papers.” – Rev. John Gogotya, ANC: VIP’s of Violence, documentary; “For revolutionary groups, the more murderous the deed, the more certain the media coverage.” -- Nicholas Partridge, Presenter, ANC: VIP’s of Violence. See: Transcript of ANC: VIP’s of Violence at: UA: [C.6] ‘If it Bleads, It Leads,’ Editorial Maxim [PDF]

[33] Clark McCauley, Ph.D, Prof. of Psychology at Bryn Mawr College, in When Does Political Anger Turn to Violence?, by Benedict Carey, New York Times, March 26, 2010 [PDF]

[34] Jean Pierre Mean, Group General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, SGS Group, In Confronting Corruption: The Business Case for an Effective Anti-Corruption Programme, by PricewaterhouseCoopers Intnl [PDF]

[35] (I) Power and the news media, Teun A. van Dijk, Univ. of Amsterdam, D. Paletz (Ed.), Political Communication & Action. (pp. 9-36). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 1995 [PDF] ; (II) Ubuntu Amicus (UA) : [C] Right to ‘Free Speech’ Propaganda Profits Deception [PDF]

[36] CCT 23-10: Statement of Consent by Dr. T. Michael Maher [PDF]; How and Why Journalists Avoid
Population-Environment Connection, by T. Michael Maher, Ph.D. [PDF]

[37] HC-WC 19963-09: 140 SA Elite Deliberate Indifference to Rule of Law [PDF]

|| Intro || Part I || Part II || Part III || Part IV || Part V ||

» » » » [Excerpt: 10-07-18: Citizen v McBride: 1st Amicus: Heads of Argument: TRC's 'Crime of Apartheid' is Falsification of History (PDF)]